Abstract

We study the problem of transmitting classical information using quantum Gaussian states on a family of phase-noise channels with a finite decoherence time, such that the phase-reference is lost after m consecutive uses of the transmission line. This problem is relevant for long-distance communication in free space and optical fiber, where phase noise is typically considered as a limiting factor. The Holevo capacity of these channels is always attained with photon-number encodings, challenging with current technology. Hence for coherent-state encodings the optimal rate depends only on the total-energy distribution and we provide upper and lower bounds for all m, the latter attainable at low energies with on/off modulation and photodetection. We generalize this lower bound to squeezed-coherent encodings, exhibiting for the first time to our knowledge an unconditional advantage with respect to any coherent encoding for m=1 and a considerable advantage with respect to its direct coherent counterpart for m>1. This advantage is robust with respect to moderate attenuation, and persists in a regime where Fock encodings with up to two-photon states are also suboptimal. Finally, we show that the use of part of the energy to establish a reference frame is sub-optimal even at large energies. Our results represent a key departure from the case of phase-covariant Gaussian channels and constitute a proof-of-principle of the advantages of using non-classical, squeezed light in a motivated communication setting.

Highlights

  • The ability to establish and maintain a shared reference frame [1] between the sender and receiver is often an implicit assumption in communication scenarios. This is the case, for example, in long-distance communication on optical fiber and in free space, where the information is encoded into quantum states of the

  • This can happen when the relative phase drifts during transmission due to a physical mechanism in the medium, e.g., Kerr non-linearities and temperature fluctuations in optical fiber [12–14] or turbulence effects in free space [15]; but it can be an effective result of other mechanisms, e.g., the use of a photodetector to measure the signals or the presence of a malicious eavesdropper [16, 17]

  • We show that the use of part of the signals to establish a common phase reference [1, 32, 33] on these channels is in general detrimental for the communication rate, even at large signal energies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability to establish and maintain a shared reference frame [1] between the sender and receiver is often an implicit assumption in communication scenarios.

Phase-noise memory channels
The capacity problem
Classical capacity of the phase-noise channel and Fock encodings
Covariant encodings
Gaussian encodings
Bounds on Gaussian communication rates
Maximum coherent-state rate and its upper bounds
Randomized on/off modulation (ROOM)
On/off modulation plus photodetection (OOP)
Two or more pulses
High-energy regime
Low-energy regime
Quantum advantage via squeezing
Attainability of ROOM rate with fully explicity OOP scheme
Comparison with Fock and ternary encodings
Beating Fock encodings under loss
Communication cost of establishing a phase reference
Discussion and conclusions
B Pure-state ensembles are always optimal among Gaussian encodings
C Communicate with phase reference
D Squeezed-coherent encodings
E Photon number distribution of single mode Gaussian states
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call