Abstract

We study the zero-temperature phase diagram of a square-lattice S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet with two types of regularly distributed nearest-neighbor exchange constants, ${\mathit{J}}_{1}$\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0 (antiferromagnetic) and -\ensuremath{\infty}${\mathit{J}}_{2}$\ensuremath{\infty}, using spin-wave series based on appropriate mean-field Hamiltonian and exact-diagonalization data for small clusters. At a semiclassical level, the model displays two critical points separating the N\'eel state from (i) a helicoidal magnetic phase for relatively small frustrating ferromagnetic couplings ${\mathit{J}}_{2}$0 (${\mathit{J}}_{2}$/${\mathit{J}}_{1}$-1/3 for classical spins), and (ii) a finite-gap quantum paramagnetic phase for large enough antiferromagnetic exchange constants ${\mathit{J}}_{2}$\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0. The quantum order-disorder transition (ii) is similar to the one recently studied in two-layer Heisenberg antiferromagnets and is a pure result of the zero-point spin fluctuations. On the other hand, the melting of the N\'eel state in the ferromagnetic region, ${\mathit{J}}_{2}$0, is a combined effect of the frustration and quantum spin fluctuations. The second-order spin-wave calculations of the ground-state energy and on-site magnetization are in accord with our exact-diagonalization data in a range away from the quantum paramagnetic phase. In approaching the phase boundary, the theory fails due to the enhanced longitudinal-spin fluctuations, as it has recently been argued by Chubukov and Morr.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call