Abstract

Abstract What distinguishes genetic algorithms (GA) from other search methods is their inherent exploitive sampling ability known as implicit parallelism. We argue, however, that this exploitive behavior makes GAs sensitive to spurious correlations between schemata that contribute to performance and schemata that are parasitic. If not combatted, this can lead to premature convergence. Among crossover operators, some are more disruptive than others, and traditional arguments have held that less disruption is better for implicit parallelism. To explore this issue we examine the behavior of two crossover operators, two-point and uniform crossover, on a problem contrived to contain specific spurious correlations. The more disruptive operator, uniform crossover, is more effective at combatting the spurious correlations at the expense of also more disruption of the effective schemata. Elitist selection procedures are shown to be able to ameliorate this somewhat, suggesting that research into ways of dealing with the effects of the inevitable sampling errors may lead to generally more robust algorithms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.