Abstract

Current design software (FloridaPier, Com624P) requires p-y curves to estimate the foundation lateral load resistance. Input parameters used to develop these curves can be obtained from in situ [standard penetration test (SPT) and cone penetration test (CPT)] correlations. This paper presents an evaluation of predictions using input soil parameters from SPT and CPT correlations versus field measured values. A lateral load test database consisting of 24 SPT and 6 CPT data sets was developed. The comparisons showed that four different SPT correlations for ϕ coupled with three different k-values all produce similar R-values. (R-value = measured/predicted × 100%). Therefore, little difference exists between the SPT correlation combinations, albeit the estimated k value has a greater effect on predicted deformation. Similar combinations of CPT correlations also show little effect among the commonly used correlations. SPT predictions are quite conservative at low load levels (R-values ≈ 53%) and remain conserva...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call