Abstract

To date, optimal propulsion in swimming has been studied predominantly using physical or computational models of the arm and seldom during real-life swimming. In the present study we examined the contributions of selected power, technique and anthropometric measures on sprint performance during arms-only front crawl swimming. To this end, 25 male adult competitive swimmers, equipped with markers on their arms and hands, performed four 25-m sprint trials, which were recorded on video. For the fastest trial of each swimmer, we determined the average swim speed as well as two technique variables: the average stroke width and average horizontal acceleration. Each participant also swam 10–12 trials over a custom-made system for measuring active drag, the MAD system. Since the propelling efficiency is 100% while swimming over the MAD system, the power output of the swimmer is fully used to overcome the drag acting on the body. The resulting speed thus represents the ratio between power output and drag. We included this power-to-drag ratio, the power output and the drag coefficient of the fastest trial on the MAD system in the analysis. Finally, the body height and hand surface area of each swimmer were determined as anthropometric variables. A model selection procedure was conducted to predict the swim speed from the two technique variables, three power variables and the two anthropometric variables. The ratio between power output and the drag was the only significant predictor of the maximal swimming speed (v = 0.86·power/drag). The variations in this ratio explained 65% of the variance in swimming performance. This indicates that sprint performance in arms-only front crawl swimming is strongly associated with the power-to-drag ratio and not with the isolated power variables and the anthropometric and technique variables selected in the present study.

Highlights

  • The overarching aim of competitive swimming is to transverse a given race distance as fast as possible

  • Power output was excluded as independent variable, because the correlation coefficient with vtrial was higher for power/drag (r = 0.81) than for power output (r = 0.66)

  • The aim of the present study was to determine which variables from the power, technique, and anthropometric domain contribute significantly to the prediction of maximal sprint speed during arms-only front crawl swimming

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The overarching aim of competitive swimming is to transverse a given race distance as fast as possible. Swim coaches are constantly looking for ways to improve the swim speed and the race performance of their swimmers, as the swimmers do themselves. Two main domains that coaches work on with their swimmers are the mechanical power that can be delivered. Sprint Performance in Swimming by the swimmer and the swimming technique employed to convert that power into speed. A third domain that is important for swimming performance concerns the swimmer’s anthropometric properties. After maturation the swimmer’s anthropometrics are fixed and cannot (or only marginally) be adjusted by training. These three domains have all received attention in studies aimed at identifying relevant performance related variables in speed swimming. An a priori selection of potentially relevant variables from each domain was made based on those findings

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call