Abstract
This paper analyzes how the Competition Commission of India dealt with the determination of the relevant market of copyrighted goods, notably science, technical and medical journals in the India Springer case. An attempt is made at explaining the complexities of such a legal endeavor which the Competition Commission of India undertook. Furthermore the paper gives a critical glance on the decision itself, arguing a different approach in the determination of the relevant market, the determination of market dominance, and the general legal analysis. In the conclusion some policy perspectives are given on how competition law jurisdiction of emerging economies should approach similar issues.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
