Abstract

This paper examines some of the linguistic tools, techniques, means, and methods by which the populations of Austria and South Tyrol construct identity. In order to better situate these two communities, this paper begins with an overview of the conditions which led to the creation of each state. It then explains some of the ways in which language can be used as a tool of identity construction. Positioning theory details ways both these groups create categories of separationand belonging. Citing the use of Austrian German, dialect in literature, differing pronunciation, and lexical development, this paper examines how the population of Austria constructs a linguistic identity distancing itself from Germany. This paper also examines how, using similar linguistic tools such as pronoun use and naming techniques, the population of South Tyrol constructs its identity. In contrast to Austria, the South Tyroleans align themselves with Germany, creating closer ties with Germanic neighbours while distancing themselves from Italy. Each population positions itself in relation to Germany, either with or against, using linguistic tools to create a group identity.

Highlights

  • This paper examines some of the linguistic tools, techniques, means, and methods by which the populations of Austria and South Tyrol construct identity

  • The Austrian Empire has its roots in the Hapsburg Monarchy, dating back to 1278 AD

  • It was succeeded by the Austrian Empire (1804-1867) and by the AustroHungarian Empire (1867-1918), the latter of which united the kingdoms of Hungary and Austria

Read more

Summary

South Tyrol

Castle Tyrol (seat of the counts of Tyrol) was built outside present-day Meran, Italy, sometime around 1100 AD in territory controlled by the reigning Hapsburg Monarchy. (including the Tyrol)—all home to Italian genhove 1991, 396) Groups, such as the Austrians and Tyrender in 1918 and despite strong opposition roleans, can position. These two diffrom the citizens of South Tyrol, the area ferent groups situate themselves culturally was returned to Italian hands. It experienced brief occupation dur- apart from German ideology and creating ing the Second World War but afterwards was a uniquely Austrian space; South Tyroleans returned to Italy. And Austria negotiated the creation of the Trentino-Alto Adige/Tiroler Etschland region following WW II, and both German and Italian were made official languages. LANGUAGE AS A TOOL FOR IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION by positioning themselves apart from Italian ideology while simultaneously allying with their Germanic neighbours

CONSTRUCTION OF AUSTRIAN GERMAN SEPARATE FROM STANDARDDEUTSCH
Conscientious objection
Literature in dialect
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call