Abstract

Cell-based assays are a valuable tool for examination of virus–host cell interactions and drug discovery processes, allowing for a more physiological setting compared to biochemical assays. Despite the fact that cell-based SPR assays are label-free and thus provide all the associated benefits, they have never been used to study viral growth kinetics and to predict drug antiviral response in cells. In this study, we prove the concept that the cell-based SPR assay can be applied in the kinetic analysis of the early stages of viral infection of cells and the antiviral drug activity in the infected cells. For this purpose, cells immobilized on the SPR slides were infected with human coronavirus HCov-229E and treated with hydroxychloroquine. The SPR response was measured at different time intervals within the early stages of infection. Methyl Thiazolyl Tetrazolium (MTT) assay was used to provide the reference data. We found that the results of the SPR and MTT assays were consistent, and SPR is a reliable tool in investigating virus–host cell interaction and the mechanism of action of viral inhibitors. SPR assay was more sensitive and accurate in the first hours of infection within the first replication cycle, whereas the MTT assay was not so effective. After the second replication cycle, noise was generated by the destruction of the cell layer and by the remnants of dead cells, and masks useful SPR signals.

Highlights

  • The cell is the minimum functional unit of living organisms

  • The Methyl Thiazolyl Tetrazolium (MTT) method was used as a reference since it is widely adopted for assessing cell metabolic activity

  • The kinetics revealed by the cell-based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay was consistent with the findings of the MTT assay

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cell is the minimum functional unit of living organisms. Knowledge of the basic cellular components and the way cells work is fundamental to life sciences, including molecular biology, cell biology, cell physiology, etc. With the traditionally used cell-based assays, it is a common practice to use radioactivity, chemiluminescence, or fluorescence to produce a measurable signal. Label-free cell-based assays have sparked interest due to their ability to measure cell responses without additional reporter compounds. Among the different label-free techniques, optical methods have been widely adopted for cell-based assays. The most effective one—surface plasmon resonance (SPR)—has been applied in the study of a variety of cellular processes

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call