Abstract

Vol. 112, No. 11 EnvironewsOpen AccessSpraying on a Summer Night: A Safer Way to Stop West Nile Virusis accompanied byPesticide Spraying for West Nile Virus Control and Emergency Department Asthma Visits in New York City, 2000 Victoria McGovern Victoria McGovern Search for more papers by this author Published:1 August 2004https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.112-a637AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit A population-level study has shown that night-time pesticide spraying in the late summer and early fall, aimed at controlling adult mosquitoes that carry West Nile virus, can be done in a way that does not drive up the number of people seeking emergency care for asthma-related problems [EHP 112:1183–1187]. A team led by Adam M. Karpati, a physician in the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, reports that in studies of the city’s 2000 mosquito spraying season, no correlation could be found between broad application of sumithrin (a pyrethroid pesticide) and asthma cases presenting at the city’s 11 public hospital emergency departments.Earlier studies had shown that high exposure to pyrethroid pesticides—often in an occupational setting—can trigger reactions in asthma sufferers ranging from mild symptoms such as sneezing and scratchy throat to more acute ones such as wheezing, chest tightness, and even death. But no data have been available showing on a population scale how the lower-level exposures that come from public health spraying of pesticides affect the large number of asthmatics that may live in a big city.The researchers tabulated data for asthma-related emergency room visits around the dates when a sumithrin-based pesticide was sprayed in each of 162 residential zip code areas in the city during July–September 2000. The timing of spraying within each zip code depended on whether surveillance indicated it was warranted—for example, if a dead bird were found to be infected with the virus, or if a human case were identified. A zip code area was rarely sprayed on consecutive days. The study also incorporated air quality data including daily measures of ozone, air particulates, and temperature, which can all cause fluctuations in the number of people seeking treatment for asthma-related symptoms. For a control, the team used asthma-related emergency room visits on days prior to spraying. They also looked at the number of asthma-related emergency room visits before and after the spraying season.The researchers found that the number of asthma-related visits in the three days before application of the pesticide and the three days after were nearly identical. Looking more specifically within the emergency department data for asthma flare-ups in children and for aggravation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease similarly yielded no correlation between spraying and symptoms.The study does not necessarily show that public health pyrethroid spraying is not a danger to asthmatics. Rather, it could suggest that the city’s method of application and/or the citizens’ behavior during spraying helped minimize exposure. During 2000, the first year when New York City exclusively used a pyrethroid pesticide, the city limited its spraying to areas where the virus was detected in birds, mosquitoes, or humans, with spray trucks usually beginning their rounds near 10 p.m. and continuing through the night to 5 a.m. Radio, television, and print media were used to alert residents 48 hours prior to any spraying and to instruct people to remain indoors and close their windows during the hours when spraying would occur.Big Apple air okay. Mosquito pesticide spraying to prevent West Nile virus was not associated with an increase in asthma attacks.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesPesticide Spraying for West Nile Virus Control and Emergency Department Asthma Visits in New York City, 20008 July 2004Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 112, No. 11 August 2004Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Originally published1 August 2004Published in print1 August 2004 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.