Abstract

We aimed to quantify spray drift-based exposure of fruits and vegetables grown in gardens or allotments next to agricultural areas to plant protection products (PPP). The amount of spray drift transported into gardens during the treatment of tall growing crops or field crops was simulated. Two different test systems in an outdoor wind tunnel were used, approximating conditions for the application to both crop types. For the experiments, strawberries, tomatoes and lettuce were used representing non-target food crops in gardens. After spraying, distance-related residues of the tracer pyranine were measured on the three food crops positioned 1–15 m downwind in the non-target area. Additionally, petri dishes were placed in front of the food crops to measure the ground deposition concurrently. For both scenarios, good correlation of residues on the non-target food crops and the ground deposition was found (linear regression model, R2 = 0.88–0.97). But unlike the field crops scenario, the experimental setup of the tall growing crops shows large deviations from the field situation, not allowing the transfer of the results to the field situation. The results of the wind tunnel experiments and of field trials on ground deposition were used to estimate the amount of PPP residues on food crops cultivated near agricultural fields. For example, application of a pesticide (1.3 kg active ingredient per ha−1) to field crops was estimated to result in residue levels of 0.39 mg kg−1 on lettuce, 0.32 mg kg−1 on strawberries, and 0.06 mg kg−1 on tomatoes cultivated 5 m from the field, thus indicating an exceedance of the default maximum residue level (MRL) (0.01 mg kg−1). Therefore, further in-depth studies are required to broaden the range of non-target crops and to refine the tall growing crop scenario to allow estimations of spray drift-based residues.

Highlights

  • In Germany, 52% of the area is agricultural land, about 31% of the area is covered by forest and 14% is used for human settlements and transport infrastructure (Umweltbundesamt 2018)

  • Many studies have determined the deposition of spray drift on the ground next to agricultural areas, which show that the ground deposition decreases exponentially with distance (Carlsen et al 2006; Ganzelmeier et al 1995; Gooijer et al 2019; Rautmann et al 2001; Schweizer et al 2013)

  • The sampling points were distributed as described for the first test system, but with sampling points at 15 m distance instead of 1 m distance, since the basic drift values show higher residue levels even in longer distances after the application of plant protection products (PPP) to tall growing crops (Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 2020; Ganzelmeier et al 1995; Rautmann et al 2001) A pyranine concentration of 0.15 g ­l−1 was applied for 3–30 s, increasing the duration with the distance of the model crop to the spray boom

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Germany, 52% of the area is agricultural land, about 31% of the area is covered by forest and 14% is used for human settlements and transport infrastructure (Umweltbundesamt 2018). Given the high percentage of land use for agriculture, such areas are likely to be in direct vicinity to settlements. This can lead to off-crop exposure when residues of PPP are transported to. In regulatory practice in Germany, basic drift values have been implemented for certain types of crops and development stages describing the amount of spray drift that deposits on the ground relative to the distance from the target area (Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 2020; Ganzelmeier et al 1995; Rautmann et al 2001). Several other studies showed deposition values comparable to the basic drift values (Carlsen et al 2006; Dabrowski and Schulz 2003; Gooijer et al 2019; Schweizer et al 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call