Abstract
Spray drift potential, spray coverage, droplet size, and spray pattern width for various sizes of air induction and conventional flat-fan nozzles with equivalent orifice areas were investigated and compared under laboratory conditions. Droplet sizes were measured with a laser imaging system; spray coverage on water-sensitive paper (WSP) was evaluated with a boom sprayer at a constant travel speed in a greenhouse, and ground and airborne spray deposits were determined in a wind tunnel at two wind velocities (2.5 and 5.0 m/s). Tests were also conducted to evaluate the effect of air-intake holes being sealed or open on spray characteristics of air induction nozzles. With the equivalent nominal flow rate, air induction nozzles had approximately 2.1 to 2.75 times larger exit orifice areas than the conventional nozzles. With the equivalent orifice area and equal liquid flow rate, there was no significant difference in droplet size, spray pattern width, spray coverage, ground spray deposit, and airborne deposit among regular air induction nozzles, air induction nozzles with two sealed air-intake holes, and conventional flat-fan nozzles. Spray characteristics of air induction nozzles could be achieved by conventional nozzles with the equivalent orifice size operated at the reduced operating pressure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
