Abstract

Passive restoration (without any intervention) has been proposed as an effective strategy for grassland restoration in abandoned croplands. However, whether the vegetation in abandoned croplands can change towards the desired state and the time needed to reach a relative stable state are context-dependent. We investigated three abandoned croplands with different recovery times (5, 15 and 20 years) and one natural grassland in each of two different types of steppe (desert steppe and typical steppe) in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China to assess the restoration potential of grassland on abandoned croplands. Above- and below-ground biomass as well as species biodiversity increased gradually with increasing recovery time. After 20 years of restoration there was no significant difference between abandoned cropland and natural steppe in the typical steppe site, but above- and below-ground biomass and species biodiversity were still lower in abandoned cropland in the desert steppe site. At the beginning of restoration, the communities were dominated mainly by annual species, especially in the desert steppe. As recovery time increased, the biomass and richness of perennial graminoids and forbs increased significantly and replaced annual species as the dominant species. In both desert steppe and typical steppes, species similarity between restored and natural steppe increased over time, suggesting that previously cultivated grassland recovered towards the desired state. Our results indicate that 20 years was sufficient time for the restoration of croplands in the typical steppe, but more time may be needed in the desert steppe.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.