Abstract

This article critically analyses the current and controversial issue of whether sponsors in Hong Kong should be subject to civil and criminal liability for misstatements in an IPO prospectus under the Companies Ordinance. It argues that the existing legal regime provides insufficient deterrence and advances policy justifications for imposing liability. It then examines the principal objections against the imposition of liability — negligible deterrence and over-deterrence — and finds them unpersuasive. It also specifically addresses the concerns arising from making sponsors criminally liable.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.