Spoke-administered thrombolysis improves large vessel occlusion early recanalization: the real-world experience of a large academic hub-and-spoke telestroke network.

Abstract

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke is increasingly controversial. Recent trials support MT without IVT for patients presenting directly to MT-capable "hub" centers. However, bypassing IVT has not been evaluated for patients presenting to IVT-capable "spoke" hospitals that require hub transfer for MT. A perceived lack of efficacy of IVT to result in LVO early recanalization (ER) is often cited to support bypassing IVT, but ER data for IVT in patients that require interhospital transfer is limited. Here we examined LVO ER rates after spoke-administered IVT in our hub-and-spoke stroke network. Patients presenting to 25 spokes before hub transfer for MT consideration from 2018-2020 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Inclusion criteria were pre-transfer CTA-defined LVO, ASPECTS ≥6, and post-transfer repeat vessel imaging. Of 167 patients, median age was 69 and 51% were female. 76 received spoke IVT (+spokeIVT) and 91 did not (-spokeIVT). Alteplase was the only IVT used in this study. Comorbidities and NIHSS were similar between groups. ER frequency was increased 7.2-fold in +spokeIVT patients [12/76 (15.8%) vs. 2/91 (2.2%), P<0.001]. Spoke-administered IVT was independently associated with ER (aOR=11.5, 95% CI=2.2,99.6, p<0.05) after adjusting for timing of last known well, interhospital transfer, and repeat vessel imaging. Interval NIHSS was improved in patients with ER (median -2 (IQR -6.3, -0.8) vs. 0 (-2.5, 1), p<0.05). Within our network, +spokeIVT patients had a 7.2-fold increased ER relative likelihood. This real-world analysis supports IVT use in eligible patients with LVO at spoke hospitals before hub transfer for MT.