Abstract

This study engages current discourses on youth participation by analyzing the designs of community-based youth programs in the United States in terms of where they fall on Hart's (1997) ladder of youth participation. Three categories of youth programs emerged from a content analysis of 31 websites and profiles compiled by the Project for Public Spaces, indicating different social constructions of participants. Youth-designed and youth-led programs that emphasize community leadership consistently use the positive language of youth empowerment when describing their participants and goals. Adult-designed and adult-led programs that employ young people to improve communities most often use the language of prevention science, or “youth as victims.” Adult-youth collaborative programs that focus on individual learning and community improvement typically present their participants and goals using the language of positive psychology, framing youth as active agents of change. The findings point to the need for study of the ways in which particular participatory program types support or hinder the personal development and leadership potential of different youth populations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.