Abstract

Nymphidae, the group of split-footed lacewings, is a rather species-poor group. Split-footed lacewings nowadays are restricted to Australasia, while fossil forms are also known from other areas of the world, indicating that the group was more species-rich and therefore likely diverse in the past. Split-footed lacewings have rather distinct larvae, roughly resembling antlion larvae, but differing from the latter especially with regard to the mandibles. Antlion larvae usually have three prominent teeth on each mandible, while at least extant larvae of split-footed lacewings only have a single prominent tooth per mandible. Fossils interpreted as larvae of split-footed lacewings are well known from amber from Myanmar (ca. 100 myr; Burmese amber) and by a single specimen from Baltic amber (about 40 myr). We here report additional fossil specimens from Myanmar amber, expanding the known record of fossil forms from six depicted specimens to 15. For the extant fauna, we could compile 25 larvae. We compare the diversity of shape of extant and fossil larvae through time using an outline analysis (based on elliptic Fourier transformation) of the head. The results of this analysis indicate that the morphological diversity, or disparity, of split-footed lacewing larvae was higher in the past than it is today. With this type of analysis, we can show a loss of diversity over time, without the necessity to identify the fossil larvae down to a narrow taxonomical range. A similar pattern has already been recognised in silky lacewings, Psychopsidae. This might indicate a general loss of diversity of lacewing larvae.

Highlights

  • It is quite apparent that there is a decline of diversity inside the ecologically important group Insecta

  • To understand the causes behind this problem, we can learn from similar occurrences in the past. Such information is provided by the fossil record

  • As the species identification of fossil holometabolan larvae is challenging, we do not use measures based on taxonomic properties, but quantitatively compare the morphological diversity of the head

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Four major lineages within Holo-metabola are generally considered as hyper-diverse, known as the big four: Diptera (e.g. flies, gnats, midges), Lepidoptera (e.g. moths), Coleoptera (beetles, weevils) and Hymenoptera (bees, ants and other wasps) Each of these four lineages includes more than 100,000 formally described species. A well-known example for such larvae is the larval form of antlions These are well known for digging funnels into sand to trap prey before piercing them with their stylets. Many groups are represented by enough specimens to quantitatively compare these to their extant counterparts (Haug et al 2020, accepted; Herrera-Flórez et al 2020) Such comparisons revealed a loss in diversity of larval forms of Psychopsidae (silky lacewings; long-nosed antlions) and at least a loss of certain larval forms of Crocinae (thread-winged lacewings; long-necked lacewings). As the species identification of fossil holometabolan larvae is challenging (at best), we do not use measures based on taxonomic properties, but quantitatively compare the morphological diversity of the head

Materials and methods
Documentation methods
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call