Abstract
While early modern scholarship presupposes the dichotomy of flesh and spirit, such conclusions ignore the constitutive ambiguity of flesh in the early modern world. To illustrate this ambiguity, I turn to two major archives: Helikiah Crooke’s medical treatise Microcosmographia: A Description of the Body of Man (1615) and William Tyndale’s Prologue to the Romans in his translation of the New Testament (1534). These texts gesture toward the reality of ‘spirited’ flesh, a flesh that possesses a form of liveliness persisting beyond physical severance from the body or even biological death. This spirited flesh is radicalized further in John Marston’s Antonio’s Revenge (1602), as dead flesh exists in a synecdochical relationship with the spirit. Yet Marston’s characterization of flesh emerges not as an early modern quirk or an occasion of dramatic heresy but rather as one supported by contemporary discourses of science and religion.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.