Abstract
In a field study, Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence was adapted to a case of racially polarized, highly publicized opinions: the O. J. Simpson criminal trial. The predicted "spirals between and within groups" (based on a fear-of-negative-sanctions explanation) and "spirals between groups" (based on a presentation-of-a-public-face explanation) were not confirmed. However, there was evidence of racial differences in respondents' concerns regarding the impact of their expressed opinions. One's willingness to be quoted varied significantly in an unexpected fashion; majority group members (Whites) interviewed by minority group members (Blacks) were significantly more willing to be quoted than were minority members interviewed by majority members. Also, respondent race interacted significantly with the media outlet in which the subject was told his or her opinion might appear in predicting reported interest in the Simpson trial.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
