Spiral time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for intracranial vascular imaging: performance compared to conventional Cartesian angiogram.

Abstract

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) usually raise the risk of potential malignancies with cumulative radiation doses. Current time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) (dubbed as cTOF), which is based on Cartesian sampling mode, may show limited diagnostic conspicuity at sinuous or branching regions. It is also prone to relatively high false positive diagnoses and undesirable display of distal intracranial vessels. This study aimed to use spiral TOF-MRA (sTOF) as a noninvasive alternative to explore possible improvement, such that the application of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can be extended to facilitate clinical examination or cerebrovascular disease diagnosis and follow-up studies. Initially, 37 patients with symptoms of dizziness or transient ischemic attack were consecutively recruited for suspected intracranial vascular disease examination from Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University between July 2020 and April 2021 in this cross-sectional prospective study. After excluding 1 patient with severe scanning artifacts, 1 patient whose scanning scope did not meet the requirement, and 1 patient with confounding tumor lesions, a total of 34 participants were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each participant underwent intracranial vascular imaging with both sTOF and cTOF sequences on a 3.0 T MR scanner with a conventional head-neck coil of 16 channels. Contrast CTA or DSA was also performed for 15 patients showing pathology. Qualitative comparisons in terms of image quality and diagnostic efficacy ratings, quantitative comparisons in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), vessel length, and sharpness were evaluated. Pair-wise Wilcoxon test was performed to evaluate the imaging quality derived from cTOF and sTOF acquisitions and weighted Cohen's Kappa was conducted to assess the rating consistency between different physicians. Compared to cTOF, sTOF showed better performance with fewer artifacts. It can effectively alleviate false positives of normal vessels being misdiagnosed as aneurysm or stenosis. Improved conspicuity was observed in cerebral distal regions with more clearly identifiable vasculature at finer scales. Quantitative comparisons in selected regions revealed significant improvement of sTOF in SNR (P<0.01 or P<0.001), CNR (P<0.001), vessel length (P<0.001), and sharpness (P<0.001) as compared to cTOF. Besides, sTOF can depict details of M1 and M2 segments of middle cerebral artery (MCA) at metallic implant region, showing its resistance to magnetic susceptibility. The sTOF shows higher imaging quality and lesion detectability with reduced artifacts and false positives, representing a potentially feasible surrogate in intracranial vascular imaging for future clinic routines.