Abstract
Spinoza's account of acquiescentia has been obscured by inconsistent translations of acquiescentia , and forms of the verb acquiescere , in the standard English edition of the Ethics . For Spinoza, acquiescentia is an inherently cognitive affect, since it involves an idea of oneself (as the cause of one's joy). As such, the affect is closely correlated to the three kinds of cognition identified by Spinoza in Ethics II. Just as there are three kinds of cognition, so too are there three kinds of acquiescentia . Two qualities—stillness and obedience—provide the criteria for distinguishing between these. This illuminates Spinoza's positive account of acquiescentia , and also clarifies how it responds critically to the equivalent Cartesian passion, la satisfaction de soimeme , which is translated as acquiescentia in se ipso in the relevant Latin edition of Les passions de l'âme .
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.