Abstract

Background/PurposeIt is unclear whether implant removal is necessary when deep spine infection of spinal instrumentation occurs. This study compares mortality, relapse, and reoperation rates between such patients with and without removal of spine implants. MethodsA total of 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics of the implant removal and nonremoval groups were compared. Outcome measures between groups were compared using multivariable logistic regression and predictors of each outcome identified. ResultsThere were no significant differences in mortality, relapse, or reoperation rates between groups. Multiple vertebral level involvement was common (85%), and the L4 (30%) and L5 (35%) levels were most commonly involved. The majority of patients had osteomyelitis/spondylodiscitis (50%) and Staphylococcus aureus infections (60%). Thoracic spine infection was associated with relapse (odds ratio = 1.26) and reoperation (odds ratio = 1.101). ConclusionImplant removal is not always necessary in cases of deep spine infection as retention of implants is not associated with higher mortality, relapse, or reoperation rates.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.