Spinal fusion surgery: From relief to insecurity

Abstract

BackgroundDuring their decision-making process patients perceive surgery as a voluntary yet necessary choice. Surgery initiates hope for a life with less pain but also creates a feeling of existential insecurity in terms of fear, isolation and uncertainty. AimThe aim of this study was to explore how patients experience their situation from the point of making the decision to undergo spinal fusion surgery to living their everyday life after surgery. MethodA phenomenological-hermeneutic study design was applied based on the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur's theory of interpretation. Data were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews. FindingsThe recommendation and decision to undergo spinal fusion surgery felt like a turning point for the patients and brought hope of regaining their normal lives, of being a more resourceful parent, partner, friend and colleague with no or less pain. Thus, deciding to undergo surgery created a brief feeling of relief. However, life with back pain had changed the patients' understanding of themselves. Consequently, some patients postoperatively experienced insecurity and a weakened self-image with difficulties creating meaning in their lives. ConclusionBeing recommended and undergoing spinal fusion surgery initiates hope for a life with less pain and altered life conditions. At the same time, paradoxically, this creates a feeling of existential insecurity in terms of facing the surgery and the future to come. It is, therefore, important to recognise and include the patients' everyday life experiences concerning how they give (or may not give) meaning to their illness, i.e. their understanding of how it is affecting them. These aspects are essential for the patients' definition and re-definition of themselves and thus crucial to draw upon in the relationship and communication between patient and healthcare professional.