Abstract

Objective. In electrophysiology, microelectrodes are the primary source for recording neural data (single unit activity). These microelectrodes can be implanted individually or in the form of arrays containing dozens to hundreds of channels. Recordings of some channels contain neural activity, which are often contaminated with noise. Another fraction of channels does not record any neural data, but only noise. By noise, we mean physiological activities unrelated to spiking, including technical artifacts and neural activities of neurons that are too far away from the electrode to be usefully processed. For further analysis, an automatic identification and continuous tracking of channels containing neural data is of great significance for many applications, e.g. automated selection of neural channels during online and offline spike sorting. Automated spike detection and sorting is also critical for online decoding in brain–computer interface (BCI) applications, in which only simple threshold crossing events are often considered for feature extraction. To our knowledge, there is no method that can universally and automatically identify channels containing neural data. In this study, we aim to identify and track channels containing neural data from implanted electrodes, automatically and more importantly universally. By universally, we mean across different recording technologies, different subjects and different brain areas. Approach. We propose a novel algorithm based on a new way of feature vector extraction and a deep learning method, which we call SpikeDeeptector. SpikeDeeptector considers a batch of waveforms to construct a single feature vector and enables contextual learning. The feature vectors are then fed to a deep learning method, which learns contextualized, temporal and spatial patterns, and classifies them as channels containing neural spike data or only noise. Main results. We trained the model of SpikeDeeptector on data recorded from a single tetraplegic patient with two Utah arrays implanted in different areas of the brain. The trained model was then evaluated on data collected from six epileptic patients implanted with depth electrodes, unseen data from the tetraplegic patient and data from another tetraplegic patient implanted with two Utah arrays. The cumulative evaluation accuracy was 97.20% on 1.56 million hand labeled test inputs. Significance. The results demonstrate that SpikeDeeptector generalizes not only to the new data, but also to different brain areas, subjects, and electrode types not used for training. Clinical trial registration number. The clinical trial registration number for patients implanted with the Utah array is NCT 01849822. For the epilepsy patients, approval from the local ethics committee at the Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany, was obtained prior to implantation.

Highlights

  • The human brain contains approximately 100 billion neurons (Herculano-Houzel 2009)

  • We show in tables 3 and 4, supplementary tables 12 and 13 that SpikeDeeptector convolutional neural networks (CNN) has classified fewer false negatives as compared to SpikeDeeptector fully connected neural networks (FNN), across the data collected from all the subjects (Utah array and microwires)

  • The results shown in tables 5 and 6 show that SpikeDeeptector CNN produces the least false negatives when compared with SpikeDeeptector FNN and even human experts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The human brain contains approximately 100 billion neurons (Herculano-Houzel 2009). The spikes generated by individual neurons (sometimes called ‘units’) can be recorded with the help of microelectrodes (Kita and Wightman 2008). State-ofthe-art development in microelectronics has allowed the fabrication of tiny but dense microelectrode arrays, containing hundreds of channels (Frey et al 2008, Lambacher et al 2011, Berényi et al 2013, Spira and Hai 2013). The activities of several hundreds or even thousands of neurons (Harris et al 2017) can be recorded simultaneously. Spikes recorded from only one neuron are called single-unit activity (SUA). Often it is not possible to determine if spikes originate from only a single source or multiple neurons in which case the activity is called multi-unit activity (MUA)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call