Abstract

Selenops galapagoensis was recently synonymized with Selenops mexicanus because the types of the former did not differ from the latter in any visible way. Additionally, a large molecular analysis of the genus from North and Central America and the Caribbean that included both nuclear and mitochondrial genes showed no differences indicating two separate species. However, no specimens from the Galapagos Islands, the only place where no distributional overlap occurs between the putative species, were previously available for molecular analysis. Recently, specimens suitable for molecular data collection became available from the Galapagos, allowing us to test whether genetic differences existed between mainland and island specimens and whether molecular data supported their synonymization. We performed phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA of newly obtained Galapagos specimens, confirmed S. mexicanus specimens, and appropriate outgroups. We found that almost all of the Galapagos specimens share identical haplotypes despite being collected from different islands in different years, and that these haplotypes are also shared with, or differ by only a few nucleotides from, mainland specimens. The genetic variation between the island and mainland specimens is much less than the genetic variation observed among other Selenops species and within S. mexicanus across its distribution. The results from the molecular data indicate that S. mexicanus was likely transported to the Galapagos Islands via humans within the past 500 years, and these data also support the synonymization of S. galapagoensis with S. mexicanus.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.