Abstract

To evaluate the impact of sperm defect severity and the type of azoospermia on the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This study included 313 ICSI cycles that were divided into two major groups according to the source of spermatozoa used for ICSI: 1) Ejaculated (group 1; n = 220) and 2) Testicular/Epididymal (group 2; n = 93). Group 1 was subdivided into four subgroups according to the results of the semen analysis: 1) single defect (oligo-[O] or astheno-[A] or teratozoospermia-[T], n = 41), 2) double defect (a combination of two single defects, n = 45), 3) triple defect (OAT, n = 48), and 4) control (no sperm defects; n = 86). Group 2 was subdivided according to the type of azoospermia: 1) obstructive (OA: n = 39) and 2) non-obstructive (NOA: n = 54). Fertilization (2PN), cleavage, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were statistically compared using one-way ANOVA and Chi-square analyses. Significantly lower fertilization rates were obtained when either ejaculated sperm with triple defect or testicular sperm from NOA patients (63.4 +/- 25.9% and 52.2 +/- 29.3%, respectively) were used for ICSI as compared to other groups ( approximately 73%; P < 0.05). Epididymal and testicular spermatozoa from OA patients fertilized as well as normal or mild/moderate deficient ejaculated sperm. Cleavage, embryo quality, pregnancy and miscarriage rates did not differ statistically between ejaculated and obstructive azoospermia groups. However, fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates were significantly lower for NOA patients. Lower fertilization rates are achieved when ICSI is performed with sperm from men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermic and non-obstructive azoospermic, and embryo development and pregnancy rates are significantly lower when testicular spermatozoa from NOA men are used.

Highlights

  • Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been the standard for the treatment of severe male factor infertility

  • There was no difference in fertilization rates when sperm from the epididymis (74.7% ± 21.2%) or the testicles (69.1% ± 19.6%) of patients with obstructive azoospermia was used for ICSI, as compared with ejaculated sperm with mild to moderate alterations (Tables-2 and 3)

  • Our results indicate that sperm from men with severely altered spermatogenesis, such as ejaculated sperm in OAT and testicular sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), have decreased fertility potential after ICSI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been the standard for the treatment of severe male factor infertility. The use of surgically retrieved or ejaculated sperm from men with severely impaired spermatogenesis for ICSI has greatly improved treatment of severe male infertility, the consequences of using such gametes are not fully known [7]. Many studies have shown conflicting results when ICSI is performed with sperm from different sources [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. It is difficult to interpret these results because, apart from few studies, only the sperm source is analyzed and there is no systematic distinction between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. This prevents consideration of the influence of spermatic defects. It is reasonable to speculate that ICSI results depend on sperm source and on the severity of sperm defect

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call