Abstract
ABSTRACT Drawing on the Tudor orthographers John Hart (c.1501–1574), Thomas Smith (1513–1577) and Richard Mulcaster (c.1531–1611), this paper shows that their linguistic treatises on spelling constitute dialogues that are heavily informed by current political thoughts. It attempts to reveal how the ideas of commonwealth (especially, absolute monarchy and limited monarchy) are employed by the orthographers to frame their envisioning of an ideal spelling system. The linguistic texts are analysed in the specific political context of the period, and they are approached from a comparative perspective in order to highlight the dialogical elements that underpin the debates. In doing so, the paper clarifies the identity of the intentionally anonymised interlocutors and emphasises the rhetorical power of dialogue in the Renaissance period.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
