Abstract
The transition from stick to slip at a dry frictional interface occurs through the breaking of microjunctions between the two contacting surfaces. Typically, interactions between junctions through the bulk lead to rupture fronts propagating from weak and/or highly stressed regions, whose junctions break first. Experiments find rupture fronts ranging from quasistatic fronts, via fronts much slower than elastic wave speeds, to fronts faster than the shear wave speed. The mechanisms behind and selection between these fronts are still imperfectly understood. Here we perform simulations in an elastic two-dimensional spring-block model where the frictional interaction between each interfacial block and the substrate arises from a set of junctions modeled explicitly. We find that material slip speed and rupture front speed are proportional across the full range of front speeds we observe. We revisit a mechanism for slow slip in the model and demonstrate that fast slip and fast fronts have a different, inertial origin. We highlight the long transients in front speed even along homogeneous interfaces, and we study how both the local shear to normal stress ratio and the local strength are involved in the selection of front type and front speed. Last, we introduce an experimentally accessible integrated measure of block slip history, the Gini coefficient, and demonstrate that in the model it is a good predictor of the history-dependent local static friction coefficient of the interface. These results will contribute both to building a physically based classification of the various types of fronts and to identifying the important mechanisms involved in the selection of their propagation speed.
Highlights
The onset of sliding at a frictional interface occurs through the breaking of the many contacts that were preventing the relative motion of the surfaces
We introduce an experimentally accessible integrated measure of block slip history, the Gini coefficient, and demonstrate that in the model it is a good predictor of the history-dependent local static friction coefficient of the interface
With Amontons-Coulomb friction this model agreed well with experiments for static measures related to the onset of sliding, such as for the length of precursors and the evolution of the normal stress along the interface, but the model did not capture the full dynamics of the rupture fronts
Summary
The onset of sliding at a frictional interface occurs through the breaking of the many contacts that were preventing the relative motion of the surfaces. With Amontons-Coulomb friction this model agreed well with experiments for static measures related to the onset of sliding, such as for the length of precursors and the evolution of the normal stress along the interface, but the model did not capture the full dynamics of the rupture fronts. In the asperity model we included a time scale inspired by the time scale identified in the same experimental system [60] that in the model controls the healing of the interface back to a fully pinned state after slipping This combined model produced spatiotemporal features of the rupture dynamics very similar to those observed in the experiment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.