Abstract
This study compared the effectiveness of three acoustic supplements to speechreading: the low-pass-filtered output of an electroglottograph, a variable-frequency sinusoidal substitute for voice fundamental frequency (FO), and a constant-frequency sinusoidal substitute that served as a representation of voicing. Both sinusoidal signals were synthesized at constant amplitude during periods of voicing. The sinusoidal signals were prepared off-line by a combination of automatic and manual estimation of the FO contours of video-recorded sentences. These signals were then resynchronized with the audio portions of the original recording. In 12 normally-hearing adults, the electroglottograph signal and the variable-frequency sinusoidal FO substitute both increased the number of words recognized in sentences of known topic by between 30 and 35 percentage points. The magnitude of this effect was greater for longer sentences but independent of basic speechreading ability. The constant-frequency substitute provided a 13 percentage point increase, suggesting that approximately one-third of the FO speechreading enhancement effect could be accounted for by voicing detection alone.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.