Abstract

Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs), an objective measure of human speech encoding in individuals with normal or impaired auditory systems, can be used to assess the outcomes of hearing aids and cochlear implants in infants, or in young children who cannot co-operate for behavioural speech discrimination testing. The current study aimed to determine whether naturally produced speech stimuli /m/, /g/ and /t/ evoke distinct CAEP response patterns that can be reliably recorded and differentiated, based on their spectral information and whether the CAEP could be an electrophysiological measure to differentiate between these speech sounds. CAEPs were recorded from 18 school-aged children with normal hearing, tested in two groups: younger (5 - 7 years) and older children (8 - 12 years). Cortical responses differed in their P1 and N2 latencies and amplitudes in response to /m/, /g/ and /t/ sounds (from low-, mid- and high-frequency regions, respectively). The largest amplitude of the P1 and N2 component was for /g/ and the smallest was for /t/. The P1 latency in both age groups did not show any significant difference between these speech sounds. The N2 latency showed a significant change in the younger group but not in the older group. The N2 latency of the speech sound /g/ was always noted earlier in both groups. This study demonstrates that spectrally different speech sounds are encoded differentially at the cortical level, and evoke distinct CAEP response patterns. CAEP latencies and amplitudes may provide an objective indication that spectrally different speech sounds are encoded differently at the cortical level.

Highlights

  • We investigated whether the Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) is an objective tool that can measure the ability to detect and discriminate between each of these different speech sounds in normalhearing children, which, in turn, provides us with normative data

  • Changes in P1 amplitude were observed as a function of three different speech stimuli that differ in frequency information

  • The results indicated a statistically significant difference in P1 amplitude of the CAEP across the speech stimuli

Read more

Summary

Methods

The main aim of the study was to determine whether the naturally produced speech stimuli /m/, /g/ and /t/, with different frequency patterns, evoked distinct P1 and N2 response patterns in terms of morphology, latencies and amplitudes that could be reliably recorded in children with normal hearing. We investigated whether the CAEP is an objective tool that can measure the ability to detect and discriminate between each of these different speech sounds in normalhearing children, which, in turn, provides us with normative data. A cross-sectional research design was employed to describe the basic analysis of CAEP amplitudes and latencies for different speech sounds

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call