Abstract
Forty‐two normal older adults, aged 60–75 years, were tested on a battery that included the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) test, conventional, and experimental pure tone sensitivity, the W‐22 test in quiet and noise, open‐ and closed‐set identification of synthesized syllables that differed in the place of articulation feature, syllable discrimination, the Block Design subtest of the WAIS and the Concept Formation subtest of the Woodcock‐Johnson Psychoeducational Battery. Results showed considerable variability on all measures. Only performance on the W‐22 Test in noise and sensitivity at 4 kHz were significantly related to absolute levels of performance on low‐ (LP) and high‐predictability (HP) SPIN test sentences. No test variables were significantly related to relative performance on HP and LP sentences. The differing patterns of results for different subjects of this homogeneous sample having excellent language skills suggested that: (1) a larger study in which linguistic abilities were systematically manipulated might produce a different outcome and (2) data for 400–500 similar older adults might show significant but differing patterns of processing auditory stimuli, particularly in the extent to which cognitive processes contribute to listening. [Work supported, in part, by NSF.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.