Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing percentage of cochlear implant (CI) users who have usable residual hearing in the contralateral, nonimplanted ear, typically aided by acoustic amplification. This raises the issue of the extent to which the signal presented through the cochlear implant may influence how listeners process information in the acoustically stimulated ear. This multicenter retrospective study examined pre- to postoperative changes in speech perception in the nonimplanted ear, the implanted ear, and both together. Results in the latter two conditions showed the expected increases, but speech perception in the nonimplanted ear showed a modest yet meaningful decrease that could not be completely explained by changes in unaided thresholds, hearing aid malfunction, or several other demographic variables. Decreases in speech perception in the nonimplanted ear were more likely in individuals who had better levels of speech perception in the implanted ear, and in those who had better speech perception in the implanted than in the nonimplanted ear. This raises the possibility that, in some cases, bimodal listeners may rely on the higher quality signal provided by the implant and may disregard or even neglect the input provided by the nonimplanted ear.

Highlights

  • Indications for cochlear implantation have changed significantly since these devices were introduced to clinical practice

  • Left to right, indicate speech perception scores obtained with the cochlear implant ear, both ears at the same time, or the acoustically stimulated ear

  • The same happened with speech perception in the binaural condition shown in the center panels: 62 out of 82 subjects showed statistically significant improvement when comparing to the latest datapoint, and this was the case for 61 subjects when comparing against the average postoperative score

Read more

Summary

A Multicenter Study

Neukam 1 , Annette Lavender 4 , Margaret K. Cywka 10 , Henryk Skarzynski 10 , Eric Truy 11,12 , Fabien Seldran , Ruben Hermann 11,12 , Paul Govaerts , Geert De Ceulaer , Francois Bergeron , Matthieu Hotton 15 , Michelle Moran 16,17,18 , Richard C. Dowell 16,17,18 , Maria Valeria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez 19 , Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães 19 , Rosamaria Santarelli 20,21 and Pietro Scimemi 20,21. Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland. CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Equipe IMPACT, 69000 Lyon, France. M.A.S. and A.C.N. share first authorship of this study

Introduction
Inclusion Criteria
Subjects
Results
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.