Abstract

BackgroundWhen evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L), children with known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L+) are usually excluded. The aim of this study was to present speech outcome of a consecutive series of 5-year-olds born with CP/L, and to compare speech results of children with CP/L + and children with CP/L without known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L-).MethodsOne hundred 5-year-olds (20 with CP/L+; 80 with CP/L-) participated. All children were treated with primary palatal surgery in one stage with the same procedure for muscle reconstruction. Three independent judges performed phonetic transcriptions and rated perceived velopharyngeal competence from audio recordings. Based on phonetic transcriptions, percent consonants correct (PCC) and percent non-oral errors were investigated. Group comparisons were performed.ResultsIn the total group, mean PCC was 88.2 and mean percent non-oral errors 1.5. The group with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) had poorer results on both measures compared to groups with other cleft types. The average results of PCC and percent non-oral errors in the CP/L + group indicated somewhat poorer speech, but no significant differences were observed. In the CP/L + group, 25 % were judged as having incompetent velopharyngeal competence, compared to 15 % in the CP/L- group.ConclusionsThe results indicated relatively good speech compared to speech of children with CP/L in previous studies. Speech was poorer in many children with more extensive clefts. No significant differences in speech outcomes were observed between CP/L + and CP/L- groups.

Highlights

  • When evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L), children with known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L+) are usually excluded

  • Missing data Over a 5-year period, 2005 to 2009, a total of 119 children were born with Cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L) in the southern region of Sweden, 27 with CP/L + and 92 with CP/L

  • The speech recordings failed for three children and one child was unwilling to participate in the speech assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L), children with known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L+) are usually excluded. When evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft. Results regarding the reliability of speech assessments need to be reported, and different types of clefts and ages should not be mixed [2,3,4, 8]. For information regarding the occurrence of syndromes, additional malformations, developmental and neuropsychiatric conditions in the CP/L + group, see Table 2. Information regarding the type of syndromes and/or additional malformations in individual children cannot be provided to preserve confidentiality.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call