Abstract

BackgroundThoracic vascular injuries following blunt chest trauma are the second leading cause of trauma-related deaths. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is the imaging modality of choice in detecting these injuries.ObjectivesTo determine the spectrum of vascular injuries detected on MDCT imaging in patients who sustained blunt chest trauma, and to assess the various types of management options and patient outcomes.MethodWe retrospectively reviewed archived medical records of polytrauma patients who presented with blunt chest trauma and confirmed vascular injury on MDCT and vascular intervention images between May 2015 and August 2018 at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital.ResultsThirty-nine patients with vascular injury findings were analysed. The injury spectrum comprised: 15 aortic injuries (AI), 19 non-aortic injuries (NAI), 4 combined (AI and NAI) and 1 aorto-venous injury. A majority of males (69%) with an overall mean age of 39 years constituted the study cohort. The commonest injury mechanisms included motor vehicle collisions (61%) and pedestrian accidents (28%); the remaining 11% were shared amongst motorbike accidents or falling from a moving train or a height. The subclavian artery (36%) was the most common anatomical location in the NAI and the frequent imaging finding was vessel occlusion (55%). The most common imaging findings in AI were the indirect signs (20.5%) followed by a grade III injury (15.4%). Six patients with a grade III AI were successfully managed with endovascular repair.ConclusionA thorough knowledge of blunt vascular injury spectrums and imaging manifestations is critical when interpreting MDCT scans. Awareness of the mechanism of injury will trigger a high index of suspicion and probe a search for a vascular injury.

Highlights

  • Blunt thoracic vascular injuries following trauma are uncommon, and in our study constituted 9.2% of all injuries in patients referred to the CT department for suspected vascular injury after blunt trauma

  • Thoracic clinical signs and symptoms may be unreliable in predicting the presence of a blunt vascular injury.[9]

  • The mechanism whereby there is high velocity and rapid impact or deceleration should raise a high index of suspicion of a blunt vascular injury

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Imaging plays a pivotal role in patient management, as clinical signs and symptoms in trauma patients may be unreliable because a majority of the patients present with impaired consciousness.[8,9] chest radiographs are usually the first-line screening modality in most trauma centres, they offer limited potential in determining the presence of a vascular injury.[4,9,10] The current use of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) may confirm few additional thoracic trauma findings.[1] contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) triumphs as the imaging modality of choice owing to quick acquisition as well as the ability to diagnose life-threatening and occult injuries that are undetectable on radiographs and ultrasound.[2,10] With improved image quality and spatial resolution on MDCT, it has curtailed the http://www.sajr.org.za. Thoracic vascular injuries following blunt chest trauma are the second leading cause of trauma-related deaths. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is the imaging modality of choice in detecting these injuries

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call