Abstract

The copper(II) β-diketonate complexes Cu(L 1) 2, Cu(L 2) 2, Cu(L 3) 2, where L 1=H 3C–CO–CH–CO–CH 3, L 2=H 5C 6–CO–CH–CO–C 6H 5, L 3=H 5C 6–CO–CH–CO–OC 2H 5, were prepared and investigated by spectroscopic (FT-IR, UV–VIS, EPR) methods. The coordination of the Cu(II) ion to the oxygen atoms of two β-diketonate molecules is observed by the shift of the ν s ( C C), ν s ( C O) and ν as ( C O) stretching vibrations in the FT-IR spectra of the complexes with reference to those of the ligands. In the visible electronic spectra of the Cu(II) β-diketonate complexes the very broad absorption bands of B 1g→B 2g and B 1g→E g transitions appear at ≈13,500, 16,070 cm −1 for Cu(L 1) 2, 14,500, 16,630 cm −1 for Cu(L 2) 2 and 13,075, 15,410 cm −1 for Cu(L 3) 2. Besides the bands of the intraligand π–π ∗ transitions (29,000–42,000 cm −1) of β-diketonates, the UV spectra of the Cu(II)-complexes contain the L σ→M d bands (45,500–46,100 cm −1). The powder EPR spectrum of the Cu(L 1) 2 complex is quasi-isotropic and asymmetric ( g ∥=2.160, g ⊥=2.050), that of Cu(L 2) 2 is axial ( g ∥=2.216, g ⊥=2.045), and typical for square-planar compounds and that of Cu(L 3) 2 is rhombic, with g 1=2.167, g 2=2.082 and g 3=2.004. The low gyromagnetic factors arise from the delocalization of the unpaired electron in the chelate rings and from some molecular packing effects.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.