Abstract

eIF3a (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3a), one of the core subunits of the eIF3 complex, has been implicated in regulating translation of different mRNAs and in tumorigenesis. A subcomplex consisting of eIF3a, eIF3b, eIF3g, and eIF3i (eIF3(a:b:i:g)) has also been identified. However, how eIF3a participates in translational regulation and in formation of the eIF3(a:b:i:g) subcomplex remain to be solved. In this study, we used the tandem affinity purification approach in combination with tandem MS/MS and identified the spectrin domain of eIF3a as the docking site for the formation of eIF3(a:b:i:g) subcomplex. Although eIF3b and eIF3i bind concurrently to the spectrin domain of eIF3a within ∼10-15 amino acids apart, eIF3g binds to eIF3a indirectly via binding to the carboxyl-terminal domain of eIF3b. The binding of eIF3b to the spectrin domain of eIF3a occurs in its RNA recognition motif domain where eIF3j also binds in a mutually exclusive manner. Together, we conclude that the spectrin domain of eIF3a is responsible for the formation of eIF3(a:b:i:g) subcomplex and, because of mutually exclusive nature of bindings of eIF3a and eIF3j to eIF3b, different subcomplexes of eIF3 likely exist and may perform noncanonical functions in translational regulation.

Highlights

  • IntroductionEIF3a (eukaryotic initiation factor 3a), the largest subunit of eIF3, contains three putative protein-binding domains

  • EIF3a, the largest subunit of eIF3, contains three putative protein-binding domains

  • In this study, we show that the SPT domain in eIF3a is responsible for binding to both eIF3b and eIF3i in the eIF3(a:b:i:g) subcomplex, whereas the RNA recognition motif (RRM) and C-terminal domains of eIF3b are responsible for bindings to eIF3a and eIF3g, respectively (Fig. 9A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

EIF3a (eukaryotic initiation factor 3a), the largest subunit of eIF3, contains three putative protein-binding domains. Results: The spectrin domain of eIF3a binds directly to eIF3i and eIF3b concurrently and indirectly to eIF3g via eIF3b. Conclusion: The spectrin domain of eIF3a is responsible for eIF3(a:b:i:g) subcomplex formation. A subcomplex consisting of eIF3a, eIF3b, eIF3g, and eIF3i (eIF3(a: b:i:g)) has been identified. We used the tandem affinity purification approach in combination with tandem MS/MS and identified the spectrin domain of eIF3a as the docking site for the formation of eIF3(a:b:i:g) subcomplex. We conclude that the spectrin domain of eIF3a is responsible for the formation of eIF3(a:b:i:g) subcomplex and, because of mutually exclusive nature of bindings of eIF3a and eIF3j to eIF3b, different subcomplexes of eIF3 likely exist and may perform noncanonical functions in translational regulation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call