Abstract

AbstractSubmerged aquatic vegetation is generally thought to attenuate waves, but this interaction remains poorly characterized in shallow‐water field settings with locally generated wind waves. Better quantification of wave–vegetation interaction can provide insight to morphodynamic changes in a variety of environments and also is relevant to the planning of nature‐based coastal protection measures. Toward that end, an instrumented transect was deployed across a Zostera marina (common eelgrass) meadow in Chincoteague Bay, Maryland/Virginia, U.S.A., to characterize wind‐wave transformation within the vegetated region. Field observations revealed wave‐height reduction, wave‐period transformation, and wave‐energy dissipation with distance into the meadow, and the data informed and calibrated a spectral wave model of the study area. The field observations and model results agreed well when local wind forcing and vegetation‐induced drag were included in the model, either explicitly as rigid vegetation elements or implicitly as large bed‐roughness values. Mean modeled parameters were similar for both the explicit and implicit approaches, but the spectral performance of the explicit approach was poor compared to the implicit approach. The explicit approach over‐predicted low‐frequency energy within the meadow because the vegetation scheme determines dissipation using mean wavenumber and frequency, in contrast to the bed‐friction formulations, which dissipate energy in a variable fashion across frequency bands. Regardless of the vegetation scheme used, vegetation was the most important component of wave dissipation within much of the study area. These results help to quantify the influence of submerged aquatic vegetation on wave dynamics in future model parameterizations, field efforts, and coastal‐protection measures.

Highlights

  • Submerged aquatic vegetation is generally thought to attenuate waves, but this interaction remains poorly characterized in shallow-water field settings with locally generated wind waves

  • Mean Hs at V1 was 0.13 6 0.09 m and 0.06 6 0.03 m at V3, where ranges indicate the standard deviation of wave heights throughout the deployment

  • Maximum wave heights at and among stations scaled with water depth, as the maximum allowable wave height increased in deeper water in this depth-limited wave environment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Submerged aquatic vegetation is generally thought to attenuate waves, but this interaction remains poorly characterized in shallow-water field settings with locally generated wind waves. Regardless of the vegetation scheme used, vegetation was the most important component of wave dissipation within much of the study area These results help to quantify the influence of submerged aquatic vegetation on wave dynamics in future model parameterizations, field efforts, and coastal-protection measures. Distribution of SAV in shallow-water environments (Stevens and Lacy 2012) These wave–SAV interactions are closely related to biophysical feedbacks involving light availability, SSC, seabed composition, and vegetation characteristics. In addition to measuring bulk quantities like significant wave height, wave period, and wave dissipation in vegetated regions, a full quantification of the spectral wave field is crucial to understanding the wave dynamics and potential feedbacks between seagrass, sediment transport, and light availability

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call