Abstract

SummaryRetinal bipolar cells integrate cone signals at dendritic and axonal sites. The axonal route, involving amacrine cells, remains largely uncharted. However, because cone types differ in their spectral sensitivities, insights into bipolar cells’ cone integration might be gained based on their spectral tunings. We therefore recorded in vivo responses of bipolar cell presynaptic terminals in larval zebrafish to widefield but spectrally resolved flashes of light and mapped the results onto spectral responses of the four cones. This “spectral circuit mapping” allowed explaining ∼95% of the spectral and temporal variance of bipolar cell responses in a simple linear model, thereby revealing several notable integration rules of the inner retina. Bipolar cells were dominated by red-cone inputs, often alongside equal sign inputs from blue and green cones. In contrast, UV-cone inputs were uncorrelated with those of the remaining cones. This led to a new axis of spectral opponency where red-, green-, and blue-cone “Off” circuits connect to “natively-On” UV-cone circuits in the outermost fraction of the inner plexiform layer—much as how key color opponent circuits are established in mammals. Beyond this, and despite substantial temporal diversity that was not present in the cones, bipolar cell spectral tunings were surprisingly simple. They either approximately resembled both opponent and non-opponent spectral motifs already present in the cones or exhibited a stereotyped non-opponent broadband response. In this way, bipolar cells not only preserved the efficient spectral representations in the cones but also diversified them to set up a total of six dominant spectral motifs, which included three axes of spectral opponency.

Highlights

  • For color vision, retinal circuits combine and contrast the signals from spectrally distinct types of photoreceptors.[1]

  • Our own trichromatic vision uses spectral signals along two main opponent axes: ‘‘blue-yellow’’ and ‘‘green-red.’’2–5 Of these, blue-yellow comparisons are based on ancestral cone-type selective retinal circuits that differentially contact SWS1 (‘‘blue’’) and LWS cones (‘‘green or red’’ aka ‘‘yellow’’), while reliably contrasting ‘‘green-red’’ is thought to require the central brain.[1,5,6,7]. This is because primate ‘‘green’’ and ‘‘red cones’’ emerged from a relatively recent LWS gene duplication that enabled new green sensitivity in some LWS cones, without providing a known means for postsynaptic retinal circuits to distinguish between green and red LWS-cone variants.[3,8]

  • Most non-mammalian vertebrate lineages, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, and birds, retain the full complement of ancestral cone types based on four opsin-gene families: SWS1 (UV cones), SWS2, RH2, and LWS.[1,9,10,11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Retinal circuits combine and contrast the signals from spectrally distinct types of photoreceptors.[1]. Most non-mammalian vertebrate lineages, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, and birds, retain the full complement of ancestral cone types based on four opsin-gene families: SWS1 (UV cones), SWS2 (blue cones), RH2 (green cones), and LWS (red cones).[1,9,10,11] Each of these four ancestral cones provides type-specific extracellular matrix proteins that developmental programs use to build cone-type selective circuits in the outer retina (e.g., zebrafish[12,13,14] and chicken[15,16,17]). Physiological recordings from retinal neurons in cone-tetrachromatic species, including turtles[18] and diverse species of fish,[9,19,20,21,22,23] consistently revealed a rich complement of complex spectral signals, including diverse spectral opponencies

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call