Abstract
SUMMARY Spectral information obtained from induced polarization (IP) measurements can be used in a variety of applications and is often gathered in frequency domain (FD) at the laboratory scale. In contrast, field IP measurements are mostly done in time domain (TD). Theoretically, the spectral content from both domains should be similar. In practice, they are often different, mainly due to instrumental restrictions as well as the limited time and frequency range of measurements. Therefore, a possibility of transition between both domains, in particular for the comparison of laboratory FD IP data and field TD IP results, would be very favourable. To compare both domains, we conducted laboratory IP experiments in both TD and FD. We started with three numerical models and measurements at a test circuit, followed by several investigations for different wood and sandstone samples. Our results demonstrate that the differential polarizability (DP), which is calculated from the TD decay curves, can be compared very well with the phase of the complex electrical resistivity. Thus, DP can be used for a first visual comparison of FD and TD data, which also enables a fast discrimination between different samples. Furthermore, to compare both domains qualitatively, we calculated the relaxation time distribution (RTD) for all data. The results are mostly in agreement between both domains, however, depending on the TD data quality. It is striking that the DP and RTD results are in better agreement for higher data quality in TD. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that IP laboratory measurements can be carried out in both TD and FD with almost equivalent results. The RTD enables a good comparability of FD IP laboratory data with TD IP field data.
Highlights
Almost 100 yr ago, the induced polarization (IP) effect was discovered by Conrad Schlumberger while doing geoelectrical DC measurements (Schlumberger 1920)
SUMMARY Spectral information obtained from induced polarization (IP) measurements can be used in a variety of applications and is often gathered in frequency domain (FD) at the laboratory scale
Our results demonstrate that the differential polarizability (DP), which is calculated from the time domain (TD) decay curves, can be compared very well with the phase of the complex electrical resistivity
Summary
Almost 100 yr ago, the induced polarization (IP) effect was discovered by Conrad Schlumberger while doing geoelectrical DC measurements (Schlumberger 1920) He observed that after shutting off the injected current, the voltage was not dropping immediately down to zero but showing some decay, which he interpreted as capacitive behaviour of the underground. This finding was used to localize and characterize ore mineral deposits by measuring strong polarization effects caused by electronic conductors and semi-conductors With improvements of the measurement technique as well as of the processing and analysis tools, the field of application for the IP method had grown steadily. Previous comparisons between TD IP and FD IP data have shown that they are similar but not equivalent because different parameters are measured in different frequency and time ranges (Zonge et al 1972)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.