Abstract
In his Perspective “GenBank—natural history in the 21st century?” (24 October 2008, [p. 537][1]), B. J. Strasser claims that GenBank follows the tradition of natural history studies. I argue that GenBank is inconsistent with some important aspects of the tradition of natural history and it
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
