Abstract

Vaccinia VH1-related (VHR) is a dual specificity phosphatase that consists of only a single catalytic domain. Although several protein substrates have been identified for VHR, the elements that control the in vivo substrate specificity of this enzyme remain unclear. In this work, the in vitro substrate specificity of VHR was systematically profiled by screening combinatorial peptide libraries. VHR exhibits more stringent substrate specificity than classical protein-tyrosine phosphatases and recognizes two distinct classes of Tyr(P) peptides. The class I substrates are similar to the Tyr(P) motifs derived from the VHR protein substrates, having sequences of (D/E/ϕ)(D/S/N/T/E)(P/I/M/S/A/V)pY(G/A/S/Q) or (D/E/ϕ)(T/S)(D/E)pY(G/A/S/Q) (where ϕ is a hydrophobic amino acid and pY is phosphotyrosine). The class II substrates have the consensus sequence of (V/A)P(I/L/M/V/F)X1-6pY (where X is any amino acid) with V/A preferably at the N terminus of the peptide. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies suggest that the class II peptides bind to VHR in an opposite orientation relative to the canonical binding mode of the class I substrates. In this alternative binding mode, the Tyr(P) side chain binds to the active site pocket, but the N terminus of the peptide interacts with the carboxylate side chain of Asp(164), which normally interacts with the Tyr(P) + 3 residue of a class I substrate. Proteins containing the class II motifs are efficient VHR substrates in vitro, suggesting that VHR may act on a novel class of yet unidentified Tyr(P) proteins in vivo.

Highlights

  • Factors that determine the in vivo substrate specificity of dual specificity phosphatases are currently unknown

  • Several protein substrates have been identified for VHR, the elements that control the in vivo substrate specificity of this enzyme remain unclear

  • The class I substrates are similar to the Tyr(P) motifs derived from the VHR protein substrates, having sequences of (D/E/␾)(D/S/N/T/E)(P/ I/M/S/A/V)pY(G/A/S/Q) or (D/E/␾)(T/S)(D/E)pY(G/A/S/Q)

Read more

Summary

Background

Factors that determine the in vivo substrate specificity of dual specificity phosphatases are currently unknown. Recent specificity profiling of several classical PTPs by screening combinatorial peptide libraries as well as earlier kinetic studies with individual Tyr(P) peptides revealed that no two PTPs share exactly the same substrate specificity profile they generally have broad and overlapping sequence specificity toward peptide substrates [3,4,5,6] Because most of these PTPs contain other domains (e.g. SH2 domains and membrane localization motifs) in addition to the catalytic domain, it is likely that the in vivo substrate specificity of these enzymes is enhanced by their “recruiting” domains. In the case of STAT5, it was suggested that the Tyr(P)138 motif binds to one of the SH2 domains of the STAT5 homodimer, thereby recruiting VHR to the substrate protein [18, 21] This interaction displaces the STAT5 Tyr(P)694 peptide from the SH2 domain and renders it available for dephosphorylation by the VHR active site. Our results suggest that the sequence specificity of the VHR active site is a key determinant of its in vivo substrate specificity

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call