Abstract
ObjectivesTo present a new knee isokinetic assessment procedure linked to noncontact knee injury mechanisms and examine correlations between variables relevant to noncontact knee injury prevention screening (peak torque [PT, Nm], time-to-peak torque [TTPT, ms], angle-of-peak torque [APT, °], mean PT [MPT, Nm]). DesignCross-sectional. SettingSports medicine laboratory. ParticipantsThirty-four agility-sport athletes (male/female n = 18/16, age 24.1 ± 3.5yr, height 171.8 ± 9.6 cm, mass 70.6 ± 12 kg). Main outcome measuresPearson's/Spearman's correlation (r/rs), coefficient of determination (r2/rs2). ResultsMost correlations were statistically non-significant or statistically-significant with only weak-to-moderate coefficients. For both knee extension and flexion, PT and MPT were significantly and strongly correlated (r = 0.99, r2 = 0.98, p = 0.001). Graphical analyses revealed two datapoint clusters for knee flexion TTPT and APT. One cluster indicated some participants could generate knee flexor PT rapidly (<150 ms) at low knee flexion angles (<45°) and the other cluster indicated that other participants could not (>200 ms, >50°). ConclusionsIn this study, most isokinetic variables represented distinct knee neuromuscular characteristics. For both knee extension and flexion, only PT or MPT need be used to represent isokinetic maximal strength. Knee flexion TTPT and APT may have utility in noncontact knee injury prevention screening with amateur adult agility-sport athletes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.