Specificity in Etiology of Subtypes of Bipolar Disorder: Evidence From a Swedish Population-Based Family Study

Abstract

BackgroundUncertainty remains whether bipolar I disorder (BDI) and bipolar II disorder (BDII) differ etiologically. We used a population-based family sample to examine the etiological boundaries between BDI and BDII by assessing their familial aggregation/coaggregation and by assessing the coaggregation between them and schizophrenia, depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, eating disorders, autism spectrum disorder, substance use disorders, anxiety disorders, and personality disorders. MethodsBy linking Swedish national registers, we established a population-based cohort (N = 15,685,511) and identified relatives with different biological relationships. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to measure the relative risk of BDI and BDII in relatives of individuals diagnosed with BDI (n = 4309) and BDII (n = 4178). The heritability for BDI and BDII and the genetic correlation across psychiatric disorders were estimated by variance decomposition analysis. ResultsCompared with the general population, the OR of BDI was 17.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.1–22.0) in first-degree relatives of BDI patients, higher than that of BDII patients (OR 9.8, 95% CI 7.7–12.5). The ORs of BDII were 13.6 (95% CI 10.2–18.2) in first-degree relatives of BDII patients and 9.8 (95% CI 7.7–12.4) in relatives of BDI patients. The heritabilities for BDI and BDII were estimated at 57% (95% CI 32%–79%) and 46% (95% CI 21%–67%), respectively, with a genetic correlation estimated as 0.78 (95% CI 0.36–1.00). The familial coaggregation of other psychiatric disorders, in particular schizophrenia, showed different patterns for BDI and BDII. ConclusionsOur results suggest a distinction between BDI and BDII in etiology, partly due to genetic differences.