Abstract

The paper describes approaches to assessing geohazards and georisk of economic losses in Moscow. It is shown that for surface construction, the principle geohazards in Moscow are karst-suffosion sinkholes, land subsidence, landslides, and waterlogging. The subsurface construction is endangered by karstification and fracturing of limestone, decompaction, and swelling of clay, quicksand phenomena, and groundwater breakthrough to tunnels. The different procedures for the assessment of geological risk in Moscow have been suggested for already existing urban infrastructure and for future planned construction. For existing surface urban infrastructure, geological risk is considered to be an integral parameter of probable damage caused by geohazards and the anthropogenic load on the specific territories. The main aim of risk mapping in this case is outlining the territories, for which restrictions and prohibitions should be imposed for further urban engineering development. For future subsurface urban construction, the risk-analysis consists in assessing the impact of geohazards on the engineering structure by comparing the future expenditures for the construction and operation under different engineering geological conditions. The procedures of risk mapping elaborated for both approaches are described; the typification schemes are listed; and the relevant risk maps built for the Moscow territory are provided. The risk maps will help planners to compare and make alternative project decisions in order to minimize the cost in future economic expenditures. Both approaches are successfully approved in Moscow.

Highlights

  • Urban Infrastructure And Subsurface Development In MoscowSustainable urban development of Moscow is based on the balance between ecological and socio-economic demands, rational nature use and improvement of ecological situation.The Moscow megacity area has reached 2511 km2 lately, whereas as long as 7 years ago it approximated 1100 km2

  • For assessing georisk that is caused by exogenous geohazards for the existing infrastructure, we have developed the mapping procedure that involves the following steps:

  • Geological risk mapping is the principal method in risk analysis at the initial stages of projecting urban development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban Infrastructure And Subsurface Development In MoscowSustainable urban development of Moscow is based on the balance between ecological and socio-economic demands, rational nature use and improvement of ecological situation.The Moscow megacity area has reached 2511 km2 lately, whereas as long as 7 years ago it approximated 1100 km2. Exogenous geological processes exert a significant impact on the geoecological condition of urban area, because of being widespread they complicate both surface and underground engineering construction as well as the operation of existing buildings and other engineering structures. In authors’ view point, the risk of economical loss caused by exogenous geological hazards in cities should be assessed separately for already existing urban infrastructure and for future planned construction.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call