Abstract
The anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) by autotrophic anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AnAOB) is a biological process used to remove reactive nitrogen from wastewater. It has been repeatedly reported that elevated nitrite concentrations can severely inhibit the growth of AnAOB, which renders the anammox process challenging for industrial-scale applications. Both denitrifying (DN) and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) bacteria can potentially consume excess nitrite in an anammox system to prevent its inhibitory effect on AnAOB. However, metabolic interactions among DN, DNRA, and AnAOB bacteria under elevated nitrite conditions remain to be elucidated at metabolic resolutions. In this study, a laboratory-scale anammox bioreactor was used to conduct an investigation of the microbial shift and functional interactions of AnAOB, DN, and DNRA bacteria during a long-term nitrite inhibition to eventual self-recovery episode. The relative abundance of AnAOB first decreased due to high nitrite concentration, which lowered the system’s nitrogen removal efficiency, but then recovered automatically without any external interference. Based on the relative abundance variations of genomes in the inhibition, adaptation, and recovery periods, we found that DN and DNRA bacteria could be divided into three niche groups: type I (types Ia and Ib) that includes mainly DN bacteria and type II and type III that include primarily DNRA bacteria. Type Ia and type II bacteria outcompeted other bacteria in the inhibition and adaptation periods, respectively. They were recognized as potential nitrite scavengers at high nitrite concentrations, contributing to stabilizing the nitrite concentration and the eventual recovery of the anammox system. These findings shed light on the potential engineering solutions to maintain a robust and efficient industrial-scale anammox process.
Highlights
Anaerobic ammonium oxidization has gained significant momentum as a highly efficient, cost-effective, and environment-friendly biological nitrogen removal process compared with the conventional nitrification–denitrification processes (Ismail et al, 2019)
The nitrogen removal rate declined from 1,670 to 1,458 mg N L−1 day−1, and the total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency fluctuated within the range of 76–88% and decreased to a minimum of 76%
Chloroflexi bacteria are highly active in protein degradation, which caters to the metabolism of soluble microbial products and extracellular polymeric substances derived from autotrophic organisms such as ammoniaoxidizing bacteria (AnAOB) in the membrane bioreactor (MBR) (Kindaichi et al, 2012)
Summary
Anaerobic ammonium oxidization (anammox) has gained significant momentum as a highly efficient, cost-effective, and environment-friendly biological nitrogen removal process compared with the conventional nitrification–denitrification processes (Ismail et al, 2019). Anammox is mediated by the autotrophic anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AnAOB), which oxidize ammonium (NH4+) using nitrite (NO2−) as an electron acceptor under anaerobic conditions and produce nitrogen gas (N2) and nitrate (NO3−) (Bonassa et al, 2021). The nitritation process is difficult to control, often resulting in an overproduction of nitrite (Tao et al, 2012), leading to the inhibition of the anammox process. This possible inhibitory effect makes controlling nitrite concentration a focus in implementing the anammox process. Due to the slow growth of AnAOB (Wang et al, 2016), the recovery from inhibition/death caused by prolonged high nitrite shock was proved to be difficult (van der Star et al, 2007) and puzzling even when a successful recovery did happen (Lotti et al, 2012)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
