Abstract
ABSTRACTA total of 121 retail market snapper fillets were collected throughout Florida and tested for compliance with labeling regulations. Samples were identified as to species by isoelectric focusing techniques against 12 authentic snapper species. Of the 81 red snapper samples, 24 (30%) were confirmed as real red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), while 57 (70%) were mislabeled. Most of the other snapper species were correctly labeled. The major substitute for red snapper was scarlet snapper (Lutjanus sanguineus), an imported red‐skin Pacific snapper species. Nomenclature of fish sold in the market is confusing since the same species of fish is frequently sold by several different names.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
