Abstract
To determine if species differences exist in myocardial response to 1,4-dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers, the binding and pharmacologic responses of a series of DHP compounds were examined in both rat and rabbit myocardium. [3H]Nitrendipine was used to label specific binding sites in myocardial membrane particulates. The results of saturation binding experiments (n = 3) indicated no statistically significant difference in either Kd or Bmax between rat and rabbit myocardial membranes (0.19 +/- 0.02 nM and 157 +/- 29 fmol/mg protein in rat and 0.14 +/- 0.06 nM and 227 +/- 125 fmol/mg protein in rabbit). Furthermore, [3H]nitrendipine binding inhibition experiments using 12 unlabeled DHP analogues yielded Ki values for each compound that were almost identical in myocardium from rat and rabbit, resulting in an excellent 1:1 correlation when data for all of the compounds were compared (r = 0.997, p less than 0.001). The negative inotropic effect of five of these DHP compounds was studied in vitro in isolated right papillary muscles from rabbit and right ventricular strips from rat, and concentration required to displace 50% of ligand binding (IC50) values for inhibition of contraction were determined. The IC50 values were significantly greater in rat myocardium than in rabbit myocardium (p less than 0.003). Therefore, a significantly lower potency of DHP calcium channel blockers has been demonstrated in rat compared with rabbit myocardium, and this species difference cannot be explained by a difference in the DHP binding site. Rat myocardium differs from rabbit myocardium in a number of ways that may explain this lower potency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.