Species comparison of compounds with known blood pressure effects in a vascular smooth muscle cell collagen contraction assay

Abstract

IntroductionThere is a great need for new approaches early in drug discovery that have the potential to improve clinical translation of compound-mediated cardiovascular effects. Current approaches frequently rely on in vivo animal models or in vitro tissue bath preparations, both of which are low throughput and costly. An in vitro surrogate screen for blood pressure using primary human cells may serve as a higher throughput method to quickly select compounds void of this secondary pharmacology and potentially improve late-stage drug development outcomes. MethodsIn this study, we investigated 10 compounds with published in vivo blood pressure effects in a commercially available collagen contraction assay and evaluated rat, human, and canine (aortic) vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate consistency between species and test their ability to predict the effects of known human vasodilators and constrictors. VSMCs were embedded at the same cell density in a collagen matrix which then floated freely in media containing test compounds. Collagen discs contracted faster than vehicle treated controls when incubated with a constrictor, and slower in the presence of a dilator. ResultsRat VSMCs responded as predicted of a VSMC-only culture to 9 out of 10 compounds. Human VSMCs responded as predicted to 8 out of 10 compounds, and canine VSMCs responded to 7 out of 10 compounds. DiscussionOur results suggest that rat VSMCs predict 90% of the effects of known vasoactive compounds in the collagen contraction assay while human and canine VSMCs were slightly less predictive (80% and 70%, respectively). Although blood pressure regulation is a multi-faceted and complex process, our data suggests the collagen smooth muscle contraction assay is useful as a qualitative early screen of compounds that act directly on smooth muscle cells of the arterial vasculature.