Abstract

Strong variation in plant organic compound δ2H and δ18O values such as leaf waxes or cellulose among species is commonly observed; however, the extent to which this isotopic variation is driven by leaf water or biochemical isotope effects is relatively unknown. Therefore, we compared variation in leaf water and organic compound δ2H and δ18O values (cellulose - δ2H and δ18O, and n-alkanes – δ2H) across 192 species grown in a botanical garden to assess covariation of isotope values (1) between elements in a given compound, (2) between different (organic) compounds of a given element, and (3) across different growing seasons. Our results suggest that variation in leaf water δ2H values are likely not a strong driver for the observed variation in organic compound δ2H values across species, and that this may also be true for δ18O values. Furthermore, even though correlation between leaf water δ2H and δ18O values appears to be transferred to organic compounds, the explanatory power of this correlation is strongly diminished (R2 < 0.04). This indicates that additional biochemical isotope fractionation leads to substantial variation in organic compound δ2H and possibly also δ18O values across species. Moreover, the low explanatory power of the correlation between cellulose and n-alkane δ2H values (R2 = 0.06) suggests that the biochemical pathways associated with the different compounds are accompanied by different isotope effects. Lastly, cellulose δ2H and δ18O values appeared sensitive to environmental differences between growing seasons, while differences in model-predicted source water δ18O and δ2H values and also climate were negligible between years. By contrast, the species pattern in n-alkane δ2H values was highly conserved between the two years. This indicates that the environmental forcing effects on isotope values were not equal between compounds. Therefore, we conclude that variation in organic compound δ2H (and possibly also δ18O) values among species and growing seasons was more strongly driven by biochemical isotope fractionation rather than by isotope values of plant water. This should be considered in the application of organic compound δ2H and δ18O values to reconstruct past climate, where invariable biochemical isotope fractionation is often assumed. Alternatively, organic compound δ2H and δ18O values could be further developed into a tool to extract plant metabolic information.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call