Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly recognised as important in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Specialist respiratory physicians (RPs) are crucial in enabling ACP in patients with COPD. Accordingly, understanding their practice and attitudes regarding ACP is important. We developed and piloted a survey to assess RPs practices, attitudes and educational needs in ACP. The response rate was 41% (17/41). The instrument was brief and acceptable to participants. Among respondents, 13% reported they had discussed ACP with "most" of their patients; 31% with "about half"; 50% with "a few" and 6% with "none or almost none". Although 57% of respondents preferred outpatient discussions, most discussions occurred as inpatients. Diagnosis, purpose of treatment and incurability of COPD were reported as commonly discussed but the appointment of a health care proxy, the patients' values and goals, and palliative care options were rarely addressed. Reported barriers to ACP included: difficulty prognosticating; time constraints; and perceived patient reticence. Facilitators included increasing patient frailty and patient willingness to discuss. Most respondents reported receiving some formal training in ACP and refined skills by observing colleagues. Many were interested in further educational opportunities. This pilot found the new instrument was acceptable. Findings suggest that ACP discussions are infrequent with the majority occurring in the inpatient setting, with key elements omitted. Participants generally had favourable attitudes to ACP and recognised for the need for ongoing training. These early findings require further investigation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.