Abstract

Rejecting the Obama Administration’s argument that the First Amendment requires identical treatment for religious organizations and secular organizations, the Supreme Court held such a “result is hard to square with the text of the First Amendment itself, which gives special solicitude to the rights of religious organizations.” (Hosanna-Tabor, 565 U.S. at 189). This “special solicitude” guarantees religious freedom from the government in all aspects of society, but particularly on public university campuses. At a minimum, religious expression and religious organizations must have equal rights with secular expression and secular organizations. In some instances, religious expression and religious expression may have greater rights. The Court’s 2020 decisions in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, reinforce and expand the “special solicitude” of religion. Indeed, Espinoza and Our Lady have profound implications for student religious groups at America’s public campuses. This article examines religious freedom at America’s public universities. This article has three parts. First, it offers an overview of religious freedom prior to Espinoza and Our Lady. Second, it briefly discusses those two cases. Third, it explores the implications of those decisions on America’s public campuses.

Highlights

  • Rejecting the Obama Administration’s argument that the First Amendment requires identical treatment for religious organizations and secular organizations, the Supreme. Court held such a “result is hard to square with the text of the First Amendment itself, which gives special solicitude to the rights of religious organizations.”

  • It offers an overview of religious freedom prior to Espinoza and Our

  • The implicit message of the Blaine Amendment was that religious organizations were unwelcome in public life and people of faith, Catholics, were second class citizens to the extent they sought to express faith

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rejecting the Obama Administration’s argument that the First Amendment requires identical treatment for religious organizations and secular organizations, the Supreme. Court held such a “result is hard to square with the text of the First Amendment itself, which gives special solicitude to the rights of religious organizations.” Espinoza and Our Lady have profound implications for student religious groups at America’s public campuses. It offers an overview of religious freedom prior to Espinoza and Our. Lady. It explores the implications of those decisions on America’s public campuses

Overview of Religious Freedom at America’s Public Universities
Student Religious Groups Have Limited Rights of Association
Public Universities May Not Force People of Faith to Violate Their Beliefs
Espinoza
Our Lady
The Potential Implications of Espinoza and Our Lady
Undermining Christian Legal Society
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call